Proceeding contribution from Lord Richard (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 31 January 2012. It occurred during Ministerial statement on EU Council.
EU Council
My Lords, three or four times this afternoon in making his Statement the noble Lord has referred to the fact that at the December meeting the Prime Minister was forced to cast his veto because he did not get the safeguards that he required to protect British interests. The difficulty is that the Government will not tell us what safeguards he was demanding and, until we know that, we cannot tell whether or not the veto was sensible. Perhaps the noble Lord could draw the veil a little this afternoon. There seems to be an atmosphere of reflective penance on the part of the government Benches today. Can he tell us what safeguards the Prime Minister was demanding that he did not get, as a result of which he felt obliged to cast the veto?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 734 c1480-1
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Business Digital technology Energy EU internal trade EU action EU external trade Economic and monetary union Oil Nuclear weapons Patents Politics and government Treaties Regulation Sanctions Service industries Myanmar European Commission European Court of Justice European Council Iran Syria
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:01:36 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_805585
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_805585
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_805585