Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Faulks (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 12 March 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill.


Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill

My Lords, as a young barrister I had quite a lot of experience of going to employment tribunals. It has now become fashionable to talk about equality of arms but on those occasions when I represented the employer I dreaded the moment when the employee was unrepresented. This usually meant that, quite rightly, extra steps were taken by the chairperson and those assisting him or her to make sure that everything possible could be said on behalf of the employee. On the whole, while I am sympathetic to what underlies the amendment, these tribunals were designed for access by ordinary people without lawyers and, while I should be the last person to stress the fact that lawyers are not always the answer, on this occasion I need some convincing.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
736 c95 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Counter-terrorism Asylum Damages Assets Debts Caravan sites Credit Coroners Advocacy Criminal injuries compensation Housing benefit Employment Housing Health services Fees and charges Human rights Legal aid scheme Immigration EU law Human trafficking Legal costs Proceeds of crime Police custody Negligence Social security benefits Sentencing Tenants Travellers Unfair dismissal Terrorism prevention and investigation measures Debt relief orders
Legislation
Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Bill 2010-12
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk