Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Greg Smith (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Tuesday, 11 March 2025. It occurred during Debate on bill on Employment Rights Bill.


Employment Rights Bill

I am sorry to have to report to my hon. Friend that, no, I do not have greater confidence that the Bill will work. He is right that the RPC placed so much of the Bill in the red column—at severe risk—and identified it as “not fit for purpose”. Some of the amendments in my name and those of right hon. and hon. Friends, to which I will speak in more detail in a moment, seek to explore further the impact that the measures in the Bill will have on the economy, and to answer the point that he rightly outlined.

Fundamentally, we know that every Labour Government leave unemployment higher than when they started; the difference with this one is that they are actually legislating for that outcome.

I will turn first to new clause 83 and amendment 283. When we were in government, we banned exclusivity clauses in zero-hours contracts. We know that this flexibility works for many employees on zero-hours contracts, such as students and those with a summer job or other responsibilities—employees can value that. This Bill imposes a statist, top-down, “Government knows best” approach, which will limit flexibility for both employers and employees.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
763 cc855-6 
Session
2024-26
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Collective bargaining Leave Dismissal Flexible working Parental leave Pay Redundancy Working hours Social services Sick pay Re-employment Zero hours contracts Agency workers
Legislation
Employment Rights Bill 2024-26
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk