Proceeding contribution from Lord Redwood (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 24 April 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance (No 2) Bill.
Finance (No. 2) Bill
I do not agree. It is easy to calculate productivity in the public sector, and it always was done—until the Government did not like the answer. It is calculated in the same way as that in the private sector. If one gets more for the same amount of resources, productivity rises, whereas if one gets less for the same amount of resources, or if one puts in extra resources yet does not get proportionately more out, productivity falls. That is happening under this Government.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 445 c399
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Alcoholic drinks Charities Capital gains tax Aviation Corporation tax Computers Cars Climate change levy Fraud Families ICT Environment protection Gambling Income tax Film Exemptions Excise duties Exhaust emissions Landfill tax Inheritance tax Fiscal policy Investment trusts Economic situation Motor vehicles Oil Pensions Personal pensions Olympic Games Life insurance Passengers Pension funds PAYE Paralympic Games Small businesses Tax allowances Tax avoidance Taxation VAT Research Trusts Tobacco Dividend tax credits Stamp duties Tax rates and bands Skilled workers Wills Tax evasion Tax yields Productivity Stamp duty land tax Tax thresholds Real estate investment trusts
- Legislation
- Finance (No. 2) Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 12:18:48 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316396
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316396
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_316396