Proceeding contribution from Baroness Oppenheim-Barnes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 18 December 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL].
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL]
On a very small point, the description ““designated consumer”” often comes up in the Bill. We all basically understand what it means, but it is probably unnecessarily exclusive. I would prefer ““priority consumer””, because that is what is meant by ““designated consumer””. Other consumers should not be left out of this provision altogether. There should be a further description in these clauses, so that it could be a priority to deal with priority consumers, but not excluding all other consumers.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 687 c160GC
- Session
- 2006-07
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Devolved matters Consumers Disadvantaged Finance Information Electricity Disconnections Gas and Electricity Consumer Council Protection Natural gas Mergers Postal services National Consumer Council Scotland Small businesses Sustainable development Wales Water companies Consumer Council for Postal Services Scottish Consumer Council Welsh Consumer Council Consumer Council for Northern Ireland
- Legislation
- Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill (HL) 2006-07
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 12:48:26 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_366574
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_366574
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_366574