Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Redwood (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.


Finance Bill

The fact that people make a profit out of something does not mean that they are not absorbing risk. It means that they have successfully managed it and moved it on. The point is whether, if something goes wrong, the risk resides with the public sector. In many PFIs in the health service and in education, the risk clearly rests with the public sector because it cannot turn around if the PFI goes wrong and say, ““That’s all right, we’ll just close the hospital? or, ““We’ll close the school.? Those public facilities are important and would have to be kept going. The private sector knows that when it enters into negotiations with the Government. When I was in the Cabinet, I remember vetoing PFI schemes for hospitals in Wales because I believed that it was cheaper to pay for them out of the long bond market or through taxation. That is what we mainly did on my watch.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
459 c725 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Crime Agriculture Aviation Business Corporation tax Climate change Buildings Bureaucracy Capital allowances Fraud Housing Education Environment Investment Income tax Energy Electricity generation Economic situation Floods Inflation Pensions Olympic Games Passengers Petrol Partnerships Pension funds Small businesses Regional planning and development Tax allowances Tax avoidance Taxation Research Tax rates and bands Rural areas Off-payroll working
Legislation
Finance Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk