Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Mann (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 23 April 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.

Finance Bill

Many of the documents, especially PFI documents, are in the public domain, and I have studied large numbers of them, as they happen to be more concentrated on my constituency than any other in Britain at the moment. Is not there a danger that the hon. Gentleman is putting up an argument that he cannot substantiate with precise examples? Is not he putting up an Aunt Sally and knocking it down with vague generalisations rather than specifics? As this is a Finance Bill, would not it be better to give specific examples on both the Olympics build and PFI contracts?

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
459 c737 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Crime Agriculture Aviation Business Corporation tax Climate change Buildings Bureaucracy Capital allowances Fraud Housing Education Environment Investment Income tax Energy Electricity generation Economic situation Floods Inflation Pensions Olympic Games Passengers Petrol Partnerships Pension funds Small businesses Regional planning and development Tax allowances Tax avoidance Taxation Research Tax rates and bands Rural areas Off-payroll working
Legislation
Finance Bill 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk