Proceeding contribution from Lord Pickles (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 10 December 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.
Planning Bill
My hon. Friend makes a reasoned point. Building on green belt is often less expensive than building on a brownfield site. The power now goes to the IPC. The Government's response to any planning problem is to exclude people and hand the job over to a quango. In truth, the proposals will introduce an unnecessary, unfair and less effective extra raft into the planning system. The quality of decision making will be markedly worse and those parts of the community most affected by the proposals will be deliberately marginalised and minimised. The existing system could be built upon and improved. The planning inspectorate is capable of reform. Why cannot it carry out the job instead of the commission, rather than establishing a new body? On the surface, they look very familiar.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 469 c42-3
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Devolved matters Accountability Aviation Conservation Climate change Airports Housing Finance Flood control Environment protection Energy Infrastructure Planning permission Planning Public participation Motorways Scotland Sewage Water supply Sustainable development Wales Renewable energy Taxation Wind power Sewers Trees Regional development agencies Carbon emissions National policy statements
- Legislation
- Planning Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-16 01:35:33 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428224
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428224
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_428224