Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.
Planning Bill
My Lords, briefly, I am very grateful to my noble friend. We got in a bit of a muddle about who was to move the amendments. I am really grateful to the officials in both departments for making the changes from ““container”” to ““goods””. I find quite funny the need to define a goods train as meaning, "““a train that … consists of items of rolling stock designed to carry goods””." I am sure that the parliamentary draftsmen have their reasons for doing it. I am very grateful to my noble friend for agreeing to the three amendments. On Question, amendment agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 705 c468
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Compulsory purchase Aviation Coastal areas Archaeology Cultural heritage Airports Land Evidence EU law Electricity generation Infrastructure Legal opinion Electric cables Powers of entry Planning permission Planning Offshore structures Public consultation Listed buildings Parks Local plans Monuments Wales Renewable energy Wave power Seas and oceans Wind power Territorial waters Air traffic Ecology Marine Management Organisation Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Nationally significant infrastructure projects
- Legislation
- Planning Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 22:55:23 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_508064
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_508064
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_508064