Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Inglewood (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.


Planning Bill

My Lords, I add my support to the remarks of the noble Lord, Lord Howarth, and the sentiment behind them. When faced with large projects, the reality is invariably that the pressure seems to be behind those who wish to carry the project forward. It is almost by definition that once it has got that far, there is an enormously strong momentum. In those circumstances, the perennial tendency is for those things that cannot be reduced to figures in some sophisticated and more or less completely incomprehensible cost-benefit analysis to get swept to one side. As the noble Lord said, what is proposed is entirely in line with the proposed Heritage Protection Bill, and it would be inconsistent for the Government not to include it here.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
705 c473 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conditions of employment Compulsory purchase Aviation Coastal areas Archaeology Cultural heritage Airports Land Evidence EU law Electricity generation Infrastructure Legal opinion Electric cables Powers of entry Planning permission Planning Offshore structures Public consultation Listed buildings Parks Local plans Monuments Wales Renewable energy Wave power Seas and oceans Wind power Territorial waters Air traffic Ecology Marine Management Organisation Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Nationally significant infrastructure projects
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk