Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.
Planning Bill
My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend for her positive answer. I thank her for what she said and look forward to further discussion, perhaps before Third Reading. It is always tempting to say that everything must be consequential with a Cabinet Office 12-week consultation period at every stage, but one then begins to lose the whole point of this process, which is to speed things up a bit. I am grateful and beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 66 [Panel member continuing though ceasing to be Commissioner]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 705 c494-5
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Compulsory purchase Aviation Coastal areas Archaeology Cultural heritage Airports Land Evidence EU law Electricity generation Infrastructure Legal opinion Electric cables Powers of entry Planning permission Planning Offshore structures Public consultation Listed buildings Parks Local plans Monuments Wales Renewable energy Wave power Seas and oceans Wind power Territorial waters Air traffic Ecology Marine Management Organisation Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Nationally significant infrastructure projects
- Legislation
- Planning Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:07:56 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_508107
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_508107
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_508107