Proceeding contribution from Lord Dixon-Smith (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 10 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.
Planning Bill
My Lords, the noble Lord has given a clear explanation of what I would call the obvious examples where it might be appropriate for these powers to exist in relation to laws that date back to the 19th century, and with which I am bound to say I have every sympathy, but has he thought about the other end of the scale? Could he give an example of a possible exercise of power that he might consider to be unreasonable, so that we can judge the breadth of the spectrum in this regard?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 705 c541
- Session
- 2007-08
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Conditions of employment Compulsory purchase Aviation Coastal areas Archaeology Cultural heritage Airports Land Evidence EU law Electricity generation Infrastructure Legal opinion Electric cables Powers of entry Planning permission Planning Offshore structures Public consultation Listed buildings Parks Local plans Monuments Wales Renewable energy Wave power Seas and oceans Wind power Territorial waters Air traffic Ecology Marine Management Organisation Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Nationally significant infrastructure projects
- Legislation
- Planning Bill 2007-08
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 23:08:18 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_508140
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_508140
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_508140