Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 28 January 2009. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].

Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]

I certainly agree with the noble Baroness about the political implications, but the point that I seek to make is that the MMO will deal with the UK Government’s functions and responsibilities. My query is this: if there are functions within inshore Scottish waters that are exercisable by UK Ministers, where does the responsibility lie? I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 74 withdrawn. Amendment 75 not moved. Clause 35 agreed. Clause 36 : Guidance by the Secretary of State Amendments 76 and 77 not moved. Clause 36 agreed. Clause 37 agreed.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
707 c280 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Conditions of employment Devolved matters Costs Conservation Coastal areas Climate change Devolution Civil servants Finance Fisheries Licensing EU law Energy Grants Inland waterways Exclusive economic zone Northern Ireland Oil Pensions Planning Public bodies Nuclear power Nature conservation Location Loans Public service Staff Non-departmental public bodies Scotland Treaties Security Sustainable development Wales Renewable energy Shipping Research Seas and oceans Wildlife Wind power Territorial waters Severn estuary Natural England Greenhouse gas emissions Marine and Fisheries Agency Marine Management Organisation Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Marine conservation zones Tides
Legislation
Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk