Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 3 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking Bill.


Banking Bill

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his remarks. He picked on specific areas. A general review of the legislation is also important and something that he may like to think about. The Banking Liaison Panel will have a very important role, but it should be mandatory for its review to take place and to be put into the public arena. It is all very well to say that the Government will consult, but if there is no set schedule for consultation, it may well not happen. I am sure that the Minister does not mean that to be the case, but there is always the risk. Information and analysis may well be technical and sensitive, and there may be an argument that the publication of the results of consultation should be delayed, but that is not an excuse for discussions that have taken place not be made public in future. I hope that the Minister will listen to those comments. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 110 withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
707 c655 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Compensation Consumers Accountability Audit Assets Debts Bank services Banks Delegated legislation Advisory services Bank of England Finance Liability Financial institutions Insolvency Government assistance Financial Services Authority Holding companies Protection Payments Public interest Public sector Public expenditure Parliamentary scrutiny Loans Post offices Post Office Nationalisation Regulation Rural areas Treasury Financial Services Compensation Scheme National Loans Fund Financial Stability Committee Sunset clauses Retrospective legislation
Legislation
Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk