Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].


Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]

My Lords, it would be churlish not to acknowledge the Minister’s response to the amendment and the good faith in which he has demonstrated his commitment to an ecologically coherent network. However, I hope he will accept that there is a strong body of opinion in the House that it is very important to make it quite clear that an ecologically coherent network must be part and parcel of the method of marine conservation that the Bill sets up. I hope to avoid coming back to this at Third Reading, but to be able to debate government amendments on this subject would be extremely satisfactory. Should we have the Minister’s proposed solution, I hope he will note that laying a statement before Parliament so that Parliament can distrust its nature is an important part of the process. Given that we have had a very favourable response from the Minister, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 114 withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c1323 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Conservation Coastal areas Archaeology Damage Byelaws Housing Fisheries Inspections Judiciary EU law Fishing catches Legislative competence Fish Fishing gear Powers of entry Navigation Powers Nature conservation Marine animals Scotland Sustainable development Wales Shipping Right of search Seas and oceans Wrecks Shellfish Scottish Executive Sites of special scientific interest Lifeboats Quotas Salmon Trinity House Ecology Marine conservation zones Inshore fisheries and conservation authorities
Legislation
Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk