Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Kingsland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 19 May 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL].


Marine and Coastal Access Bill [HL]

My Lords, I have an amendment in this group which broadly endorses what the noble Lord, Lord Wallace, has just said. My particular concern is with Clause 149(2)(b), which, roughly, seeks to balance the social and economic benefits of exploiting the sea fishery resources with the need to protect the marine environment. My amendment would add to Clause 149(2)(b) the expression, ""in a way which is consistent with sustainable development"." That is because the present text could lead to a situation in which the social and economic benefits of exploiting the sea played a stronger part in the mind of the decision-maker than the need to protect the marine environment. In other words, we need to put some spin on the subsection to ensure that, where there is a conflict, the principle of sustainable development prevails. I saw the Minister’s face express a degree of pain at my last statement. Nevertheless, he will understand where I am coming from.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
710 c1334-5 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Conservation Coastal areas Archaeology Damage Byelaws Housing Fisheries Inspections Judiciary EU law Fishing catches Legislative competence Fish Fishing gear Powers of entry Navigation Powers Nature conservation Marine animals Scotland Sustainable development Wales Shipping Right of search Seas and oceans Wrecks Shellfish Scottish Executive Sites of special scientific interest Lifeboats Quotas Salmon Trinity House Ecology Marine conservation zones Inshore fisheries and conservation authorities
Legislation
Marine and Coastal Access Bill (HL) 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk