Proceeding contribution from Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 11 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on Draft National Policy Statement for Fossil Fuel Electricity Generating Infrastructure (EN-2).
Draft National Policy Statement for Fossil Fuel Electricity Generating Infrastructure (EN-2)
I have talked to the BP people about the project at Peterhead. The storage was to be in the depleted Miller oilfield, which was very conveniently placed. BP felt that it had to abandon the project in the end because it had asked for government support either for what will now be available for the demonstration projects or for the carbon price so that it would know what the carbon advantage of a fully economic CCS plant would be. They did not get either of those things from the Government. I am on record in Hansard as having described that on the Floor of the House to the noble Lord, Lord Rooker, as an absolutely disastrous decision by the Government.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 718 c151GC
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Coal fired power stations Carbon capture and storage Electricity generation Electricity Infrastructure Electric cables Oil Planning permission Planning Natural gas Parliamentary scrutiny Pipelines Storage Renewable energy Wind power National grid Fossil fuelled power stations Liquefied natural gas Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:50:36 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_630040
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_630040
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_630040