Proceeding contribution from Lord Crickhowell (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 11 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on Draft National Policy Statement for Fossil Fuel Electricity Generating Infrastructure (EN-2).
Draft National Policy Statement for Fossil Fuel Electricity Generating Infrastructure (EN-2)
Is not one problem of the Government's approach to the Severn tidal barrage that they are concentrating their efforts on an assessment of the set of selected projects, rather than doing what Hermann Bondi did so thoroughly and efficiently a quarter of a century ago, which was to look first at the basic cost/benefit analysis in order to make sure that the fundamentals of the project were right, whichever project was selected? It is by no means clear that the work that was done so well at the time has been repeated on this occasion. I am sure that it will need to be.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 718 c172GC
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Coal fired power stations Carbon capture and storage Electricity generation Electricity Infrastructure Electric cables Oil Planning permission Planning Natural gas Parliamentary scrutiny Pipelines Storage Renewable energy Wind power National grid Fossil fuelled power stations Liquefied natural gas Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:34:16 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_630067
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_630067
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_630067