Proceeding contribution from Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 11 March 2010. It occurred during Debate on Draft National Policy Statement for Fossil Fuel Electricity Generating Infrastructure (EN-2).
Draft National Policy Statement for Fossil Fuel Electricity Generating Infrastructure (EN-2)
Yes, there is a subsidy, and I do not think that the Government have ever denied that that subsidy is called the renewables obligation. But I know that when I mention the name of the noble Lord, Lord Stern, it does not always produce the joy I expect to see. The fact is, however, that in general renewable energy is more expensive. It will not be developed without a subsidy—that is what the renewables obligation is—but the work of the noble Lord, Lord Stern, has shown that if we are to reach a low-carbon energy future, the sooner we start down this route, the more cost-effective it will be.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 718 c173GC
- Session
- 2009-10
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Coal fired power stations Carbon capture and storage Electricity generation Electricity Infrastructure Electric cables Oil Planning permission Planning Natural gas Parliamentary scrutiny Pipelines Storage Renewable energy Wind power National grid Fossil fuelled power stations Liquefied natural gas Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:48:58 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_630072
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_630072
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_630072