Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Berkeley (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

My Lords, I am extremely grateful to the Minister for a very full response on this group of amendments. It is incredibly helpful to have it on the record. I am sure we will be happy with the response on some of the amendments, but it will certainly be necessary to read in detail what the Minister said to see the extent to which it is worth taking the amendments further to try to simplify the objective of a one-stop shop. Before I withdraw the amendment, I want to put on record that I do not think any of us were trying to blame the Minister for not having a meeting. We are all guilty, or we are all innocent. We did not have it, and we have a lesson to learn from that. I am sure that, if we find something we would like to discuss before Third Reading, the Minister will, as usual, be pleased to see us. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 223ZA withdrawn. Amendments 223ZB to 223ZL not moved. Clause 117 : Transitional provision in connection with abolition Clause 117 : Transitional provision in connection with abolition Amendment 223ZM not moved. Amendment 223A Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c110 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Appeals Compulsory purchase Advertising Construction Equality Housing Finance Land Infrastructure Green belt Local government Planning permission Nuisance Planning Natural gas Public consultation Public expenditure Referendums Railways Property development Parish and town councils Local plans Sustainable development Travellers Regional spatial strategies Affordable housing Infrastructure Planning Commission Community infrastructure levy Village greens
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk