Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Reay (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 17 October 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Localism Bill.


Localism Bill

I thank my noble friend Lord True for his support for my amendment. I agree with him that we have not seen the end of this matter. I was sorry not to have the support of noble Lords opposite. For once they have revealed themselves in their centralist colours. The Minister entered fully into the arguments on the amendment and I am grateful for that. He said that the Government want to limit appeals—they do not want everything decided in Bristol—but, of course, the effect of my amendment would be to reduce appeals. I appreciate that he repeated what was said at an earlier stage about costs awards and I appreciate what he had to say about the consultation that would need to take place with local communities. In those circumstances, I am happy to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 232ZA withdrawn. Amendment 232ZB not moved. Clause 131 : Application of this Part to the Crown Clause 131 : Application of this Part to the Crown Amendment 232A not moved. Amendment 232AA Moved by


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
731 c141 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Compensation Appeals Compulsory purchase Advertising Construction Equality Housing Finance Land Infrastructure Green belt Local government Planning permission Nuisance Planning Natural gas Public consultation Public expenditure Referendums Railways Property development Parish and town councils Local plans Sustainable development Travellers Regional spatial strategies Affordable housing Infrastructure Planning Commission Community infrastructure levy Village greens
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk