Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Cameron of Dillington (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Monday, 22 June 2020. It occurred during Debate on bill on Fisheries Bill [HL].


Fisheries Bill [HL]

My Lords, my reference to the Marine (Scotland) Act was really trying to say that the authorities up there went for the socioeconomic objective rather than the long-term environmental objective and, as a result, six years after the Marine (Scotland) Act, fishing continues in what should be a protected area. As the noble Lord, Lord Krebs, said in his introduction, short-term socioeconomic priorities always seem to trump long-term environmental objectives. Of course, we all know that such an approach is based on a false premise because securing good ocean health provides the strongest possible foundation for a sustainable industry. In response to the noble Earl, Lord Caithness, it is like a farmer nurturing his soil: without that long-term approach, the socioeconomic future of an industry is not realistically secure. Does the Minister not think that we should now endeavour to achieve the sustainability objectives instead of the eight objectives in Clause 1, which, put together, mean very little?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
804 c51 
Session
2019-21
Procedure
Virtual contributions
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Devolved matters Common fisheries policy Conservation Climate change Crew Employment Fisheries Licensing Environment protection EU law Fishing vessels Economic situation Fish Fishing gear Northern Ireland Marine animals Migrant workers Scotland Training Safety Sustainable development Wales Seas and oceans Wildlife Quotas Total allowable catches UN Convention on the Law of the Sea Freshwater fish Philippines UK relations with EU Aquaculture
Legislation
Fisheries Bill (HL) 2019-21
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on hansard.parliament.uk