Proceeding contribution from Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 27 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Civil Aviation Bill.
Civil Aviation Bill
Does the Minister not accept that for those who live under the flight path, as many of my constituents do—and as I do, which faces me with a conflict on this issue—the number of aircraft movements, especially at night, is just as important as the cumulative noise quotas proposed by provisions in the Bill that would allow an end to controls on the number of movements? For those who are awoken at night by an aircraft, what matters is not the cumulative noise quota but the very fact that they have been woken up.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 435 c1036
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Companies Aviation Air pollution Aircraft Airports Air routes Health Finance Licensing Fines Exhaust emissions Heathrow Airport Protection Monitoring Passengers Noise Stansted Airport Regional airports South East Aviation Health Unit Gatwick Airport Air Travel Trust
- Legislation
- Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-12-01 12:19:06 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_253892
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_253892
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_253892