Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Tom Brake (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Monday, 27 June 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Civil Aviation Bill.


Civil Aviation Bill

I begin by thanking the Secretary of State for contacting me to explain his absence from today’s debate. It was perhaps uncharitable—although only slightly—of the official Opposition spokesman to describe the Bill as an aviation paella: as a trail mix of aviation measures, to be washed down with a night cap of a pint of Special Brew. What is clear is that, as the hon. Member for Crawley (Laura Moffatt) said, aviation Bills do not land very often. So when one does, Members need to take the opportunity to examine it closely, to see whether it delivers on certain key principles. The Government have stated two such key principles: that ““predict and provide”” in aviation is dead, and that the polluter will pay. I am afraid to say that the Bill fails the first principle and that it partly fails the second, in that it in fact says that the polluter ““might”” pay.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
435 c1058-9 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Companies Aviation Air pollution Aircraft Airports Air routes Health Finance Licensing Fines Exhaust emissions Heathrow Airport Protection Monitoring Passengers Noise Stansted Airport Regional airports South East Aviation Health Unit Gatwick Airport Air Travel Trust
Legislation
Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk