Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Richard Ottaway (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 12 January 2006. It occurred during Adjournment debate on Security of Supply.


Security of Supply

Much as I was looking forward to the prospect of giving lengthy advice to my constituent—the Minister for Energy—in the interests of brevity I will keep my contribution short. I am not alone in finding the Russian Government’s decision to cut off gas supplies to Ukraine chilling, and the implications are quite substantial. In truth, being dependent for our energy supplies on a country that is prepared to cut off those supplies will emasculate our foreign policy. In certain circumstances, our foreign policy could be affected by dependency on imported energy from risky nations. That leads me to a conclusion with which the hon. Member for Lewisham, Deptford (Joan Ruddock) will strongly disagree—that we must greatly increase our dependence on nuclear power. To me, the question is not nuclear versus coal but nuclear versus gas from risky sources. I am a strong believer in nuclear power. The French derive 75 per cent. of their energy from nuclear and 15 per cent. from hydroelectric, so 90 per cent. of their energy comes from their own sources. I agree with my hon. Friend the Member for Grantham and Stamford (Mr. Davies): at least 50 per cent. of our energy should come from nuclear sources.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
441 c523-4 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Companies Conservation Coal Climate change Energy Electricity generation Energy supply Distribution Fuel poverty Imports Oil Natural gas Nuclear power Prices Storage Sustainable development Tax allowances Renewable energy Reviews Reserves
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk