Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Whitty (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 30 January 2007. It occurred during Debate on bill on Consumers Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL].


Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill [HL]

My Lords, I support the amendments. They make it clear that all issues concerning cut off of supply—whether through a threat of disconnection or a failure somewhere else in the system—will be treated in this way. I simply make the point that I might have made on the previous group of amendments that these are the kind of complaints that would fall to the new National Consumer Council. I know that Energywatch takes the view that there is a wider set of priority complaints over and above those dealing with disconnection or failure of supply. At some point it will need to be made clear what boundaries will be considered by the National Consumer Council, by the normal information function of Consumer Direct or by the companies themselves in the first instance, and, if they fail, by the ombudsman system. It would be helpful if such clarity were placed on the Postwatch side of the equation so that the new structures and consumers can be clear where each form of complaint will in future fall. On Question, amendment agreed to.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
689 c153 
Session
2006-07
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Complaints Devolved matters Consumers Energy Electricity Disconnections Gas and Electricity Consumer Council Protection Natural gas Mergers Ombudsman Postal services National Consumer Council Small businesses Sustainable development Rural areas Voluntary work Consumer Council for Postal Services Scottish Consumer Council Post Office Users' Council for Northern Ireland Welsh Consumer Council
Legislation
Consumers, Estate Agents and Redress Bill (HL) 2006-07
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk