Parliamentary Search

Proceeding contribution from Robert Neill (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 24 November 2008. It occurred during Debate on bill on Planning Bill.

Planning Bill

Before I leave the right hon. Gentleman to the tender mercies of my hon. Friend the Member for Beckenham (Mrs. Lait), can he help me on this matter? Given the Minister's surprising and uncharacteristic degree of cynicism, how does he square what he said with the statement of his ministerial colleague the noble Baroness Andrews, who said in the other place:"““We support the underlying aim of the amendment.””—[Official Report, House of Lords, 12 November 2008; Vol. 705, c. 694.]?" If the Government support the underlying aim, it cannot be logical to suggest that it comes from some motive to prevent excessive development.

Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
483 c532 
Session
2007-08
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Appeals Applications Construction Climate change Common land Design Delegated legislation Advisory services Brownfield sites Conservation areas Housing Fees and charges Land Infrastructure Land use Legal opinion Gardens Local government Low incomes Planning authorities Planning permission Planning Parliamentary scrutiny Public participation Property development Parks Parliamentary privilege Scotland Water Regional planning and development Sustainable development Renewable energy Urban areas Sewers Greenfield sites Local development frameworks Infrastructure Planning Commission National policy statements Community infrastructure levy
Legislation
Planning Bill 2007-08
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk