Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Noakes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 3 February 2009. It occurred during Debate on bill on Banking Bill.


Banking Bill

My Lords, my Whip was yelling in my ear and I was momentarily distracted, so I apologise. I should say that I had intended to talk about this clause in Committee in a clause stand part debate when it was Clause 238, but in the early hours of last Tuesday morning the clause managed to stand part without my addressing it. I have now tabled an amendment in order to probe the issue. This clause allows the FSA to vary permissions to carry on regulated activities on its own initiative inter alia where it is desirable to protect consumers. There is nothing wrong with that, but the new wording added by Clause 245 means that the FSA can vary permission in relation to bank A even though the consumer protection is in respect of the customers of bank B. I struggle to see how that might be appropriate, so my purpose for questioning this clause in Committee and again today is to find out what the clause is designed to do in practice. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
707 c643 
Session
2008-09
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Compensation Consumers Accountability Audit Assets Debts Bank services Banks Delegated legislation Advisory services Bank of England Finance Liability Financial institutions Insolvency Government assistance Financial Services Authority Holding companies Protection Payments Public interest Public sector Public expenditure Parliamentary scrutiny Loans Post offices Post Office Nationalisation Regulation Rural areas Treasury Financial Services Compensation Scheme National Loans Fund Financial Stability Committee Sunset clauses Retrospective legislation
Legislation
Banking Bill 2007-08 to 2008-09
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk