Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Marland (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 27 July 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Energy: Annual Statement.


Energy: Annual Statement

Let me first assure the noble Lord that we will not be making any derogatory remarks—or I hope that noble Lords do not hear them from me, anyway—about denial. All views are welcome, and I have invited many noble Lords to the department to hear their views during the past week. We have had views ranging from all sides of the House, both political and in terms of climate change. Those views are fed into our 2050 document and will be treated with the respect that they deserve. I am glad to have a history lesson on what the Commons did or did not do, but I would take issue on the subject of coal, which is a very dirty and not carbon-friendly product. We need to ensure that it is clean, which is why we are having CCS trial cases, on which we will push the button towards the end of this year. I am delighted that we will have a grown-up discussion on that. We are pump-priming offshore wind technology because, as the 2050 pathway document shows, we need to have energy from many sources. Nuclear is a mature source, whereas offshore wind is not as mature. To see whether it has the economic benefits that we think it has, it must be proceeded with.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
720 c1248 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Conservation Climate change Carbon capture and storage Housing Finance Energy Ofgem Electricity Heating Oil Natural gas Nuclear power Meters Prices Microgeneration Offshore industry Renewable energy Green Investment Bank Social tariffs
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk