Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 26 October 2010. It occurred during Ministerial statement on Transport: Investment.


Transport: Investment

My Lords, would the Minister agree that it is difficult to accept that dealing with the deficit is the number one priority when an announcement is made locally that the £50 million made annually by the congestion charge in west London is likely to be abandoned in December, with all the attendant loss for the capital that will go with it? That sits neither very squarely with dealing with the deficit nor indeed with fairness, when one sees the nature of the people who will be the beneficiaries from the abandonment of the west London congestion area. I should like to ask something more positive. Nowhere in the document is there anything that gives us great of hope of seeing a strategic approach to many of the problems that we face. In particular, I pick up the point made by the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, about the massive cut coming in the maintenance of roads. Some £200 million is to be taken out every year over the next four years, after a particularly difficult winter. If we have another hard winter, at the rate we are going we will be like a third-rate country. Will the Minister please explain the criterion used to determine how the £200 million should be saved in each of the next four years? Is that to be done by local authorities or has some criterion been set for establishing that? Secondly, which schemes have been totally abandoned? It is very difficult when reading the documentation to identify whether any have gone. My reading of it is that some have gone all the way. Will he please place a list in the Library? Thirdly, are the Government giving any thought to alternative means of raising funds to reinvest in the road transport system? For example, a number of parts of the country were exploring the possibility of introducing congestion charging—not solely to raise funds but to reduce congestion—and such schemes would have been helpful in providing funding for reinvestment in other parts of road transport. Has that been totally abandoned by this Government? Does the noble Earl have any views on how they might explore alternative ways in which money may be raised?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
721 c1162-3 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Bus services Construction Bridges Finance Ipswich Isle of Wight Highways Agency Nottingham Midland Metro Motorways M25 Transport Roads Repairs and maintenance Road traffic control Sheffield Trams Tyne and Wear Metro Bypasses Tees Valley M6 M1 Taunton Hounslow Dual carriageways M4 M62 M5 Sefton Mansfield River Mersey Lancaster M60 Runcorn Leeds Station A11 Weymouth A57 A23 A556
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk