Proceeding contribution from Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 2 March 2011. It occurred during Debate on bill on Energy Bill [HL].
Energy Bill [HL]
My Lords, I thank the Minister for his reply and his continued interest, which is genuinely recognised and welcomed by the industry. I agree absolutely with my noble friend Lord Dixon-Smith about the amount of energy, and heat particularly, that we waste, whether welling up from the ground in many ways or from industrial applications. Perhaps I may be forgiven for saying that one of the reasons is that we do not have a culture of district heating in this country. We look at each dwelling as an individual area. That is one of the things that has to change in terms of being able to utilise that energy. I thank him for reminding me of that. I am well satisfied that the Government are taking this agenda forward seriously. This particular amendment is no longer appropriate. I have pleasure in begging leave to withdraw my amendment. Amendment 166 withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 725 c1167-8
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Codes of practice Costs Conservation Accidents Carbon Housing Fees and charges Licensing Environment Energy Electricity generation Ofgem Electricity Farms Fuel poverty Insulation Heating Landlords Low incomes Oil Natural gas Property Meters Private rented housing Scotland Tenants Carbon emissions Geothermal power Green deal scheme
- Legislation
- Energy Bill (HL) 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:46:06 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_720120
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_720120
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_720120