Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bradshaw (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 8 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Civil Aviation Bill.


Civil Aviation Bill

I support the amendment moved by the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley. The whole issue of noise around airports is one to which we shall return. To the extent that premises such as those mentioned by the noble Lord have been given protection by installation and ventilation, that is good. On Wednesday, there was a report in the Times, to which we did not refer, that Ministers are consulting on changing the way in which airliners approach and leave Heathrow. Up to now, there has been some alleviation of noise because the runways are used in alternating order, so that at least for half the day, people get some relief from the noise. If the Government intend after consultation that people will be subjected to even more noise, which is in itself objectionable and something that we may not support, I should like to hear from the Minister that there is some intention to give the afflicted communities some relief by means of the measures to which the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, referred.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c108GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Compensation Detainees Arrests Aviation Air pollution Buildings Competition Airports Air routes British Transport Police Damage Airlines Health Fees and charges Liability Environment Households Insurance Insulation Exhaust emissions Police Management Monitoring Passengers Noise Security Safety Tour operators London airports Air Travel Trust Countries
Legislation
Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk