Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanningfield (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 8 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Civil Aviation Bill.


Civil Aviation Bill

What the local community wants is confidence in the knowledge that the security arrangements are in place. It would be totally wrong to involve members of a local community in the detail of those arrangements—they would cease to be security arrangements if everyone knew what they were. We had an incident at Stansted Airport in which a plane crashed not far from the airfield. It was not a security matter, but initially it was thought that it could have been. Local people now want to know that the local police and the airport authorities are doing the right things. They accept that they will not be given the detail because they understand that these are security measures, which have to be kept secret. It is a matter of ensuring that the community is confident that the arrangements are in place. That is the right thing to do.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c121GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Complaints Compensation Detainees Arrests Aviation Air pollution Buildings Competition Airports Air routes British Transport Police Damage Airlines Health Fees and charges Liability Environment Households Insurance Insulation Exhaust emissions Police Management Monitoring Passengers Noise Security Safety Tour operators London airports Air Travel Trust Countries
Legislation
Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk