Proceeding contribution from Lord Hanningfield (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 8 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Civil Aviation Bill.
Civil Aviation Bill
I thank the noble Lord for his reply, which was much as we expected. I agree that compensation for airports alone should not be addressed. I think we have a problem. I will try and find some international examples so that I can catch the Minister out on another occasion. The cost of a project goes up a lot because we cannot acquire properties because of the compensation system in this country. There is an issue here that warrants consideration. The noble Lord made a political point about the next government. Given the events of this week, I think I know what the next government will be and I shall encourage them to do something about this, as we have encouraged other governments in the past. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c160GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Compensation Detainees Arrests Aviation Air pollution Buildings Competition Airports Air routes British Transport Police Damage Airlines Health Fees and charges Liability Environment Households Insurance Insulation Exhaust emissions Police Management Monitoring Passengers Noise Security Safety Tour operators London airports Air Travel Trust Countries
- Legislation
- Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:16:58 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285301
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285301
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285301