Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 8 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Civil Aviation Bill.
Civil Aviation Bill
I think I am right that the Civil Aviation Authority has jurisdiction on work at height regulations. Therefore, there is a difference between the CAA and the HSE on that issue. Why should not affairs on board aircraft, about which the CAA has infinite knowledge, be transferred to it? It would have much more knowledge than the Health and Safety Executive?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c128-9GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Complaints Compensation Detainees Arrests Aviation Air pollution Buildings Competition Airports Air routes British Transport Police Damage Airlines Health Fees and charges Liability Environment Households Insurance Insulation Exhaust emissions Police Management Monitoring Passengers Noise Security Safety Tour operators London airports Air Travel Trust Countries
- Legislation
- Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:30:11 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285257
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285257
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_285257