Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 5 December 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Civil Aviation Bill.
Civil Aviation Bill
The problem that my noble friend faces, as we all do, is that to give anyone a veto in this matter is highly dangerous—whether you give local authorities or local communities a veto. Speaking again from my experience, I believe that the important thing is to provide sufficient information on which local authorities can come to a conclusion. If that information is not provided, you do of course get an ill balanced debate. Equally, as far as local people are concerned, some people can be expected to be reasonable, but others are utterly unreasonable. How do you solve their problems? I am not arguing against the fact that there has to be some sort of effective and reasonable consultation, but to expect that it will solve all the problems—notwithstanding what I have said—is impossible.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c72GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Appeals Aviation Air pollution Competition Aircraft Airports Airlines Fees and charges Liability Fines Insurance Exhaust emissions Heathrow Airport Powers Management Pollution control Monitoring Noise Night flying Terrorism Sustainable development Stansted Airport Gatwick Airport
- Legislation
- Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:10:55 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283642
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283642
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_283642