Proceeding contribution from Baroness Verma (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 1 March 2011. It occurred during Ministerial statement on International Aid Reviews: Conclusions.
International Aid Reviews: Conclusions
First of all, I thank the noble Baroness for her opening comments. We all accept that DfID did some fantastic work when the Opposition were in government. However, the focus there was on inputs. We want to try to reshape the programmes and put the focus on outputs as well as inputs, so that we can measure the results and see that, where programmes are working, they are working well. The noble Baroness has asked a number of questions and I will try to answer as many of them as I can. Where I do not answer, I will of course write back to her. A larger scale-up of aid for Burundi would have required us to show a significant impact on value for money and we believe that there are other comparative partners and donors in Burundi who will do far better than us. We would not have been able to achieve the sorts of results that we would have wanted by scaling up in the short term. We want to deliver value for money and results-based aid through larger existing programmes. From 2012, DfID will focus exclusively on supporting Burundi’s integration into the East African Community, as we believe that this is a critical factor in the country’s medium-term growth. All of DfID’s regional integration work will be managed by TradeMark East Africa, which has an established office. DfID will continue to support Burundi from Rwanda and Nairobi through those organisations. The noble Baroness asked about UN Women's funding. We have agreed to support transitional costs but, when I spoke to Michelle Bachelet at the launch of UN Women, we made it clear to her that we wanted to see a strategic framework and, based on that framework, most major donors want to see what the priorities will be. She has readily accepted that and she has accepted that, if we are to be key donors to UN Women—the noble Baroness will be aware that we were through UNIFEM—we need to ensure that the money will be spent and directed through a strategic plan which will deliver the outcomes, as I am sure the noble Baroness would wish. I noticed that the noble Baroness raised the Pope's visit again. I remind her that the funding for that was agreed to by her Government in March 2010; they agreed that different departments would pay for the visit. We also need to highlight the fact that the Catholic Church does a lot of genuinely good work across the globe and that it was right that his visit highlighted the excellent work undertaken by the Catholic Church. As her Government agreed to it, we honoured the undertaking. On the Sudanese question, we agree that there are enormous needs there. It will take a lot of time and intervention but we will be very supportive of both sides in Sudan. We want to ensure that we build capacity for them. Noble Lords will understand that we shall be delivering in very difficult environments, but we shall continue to be responsive on the ground and see where we can deliver better and more.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 725 c979-80
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Armed conflict Developing countries Development aid Bilateral aid Cameroon China Women Elections Education Iraq Disease control Drinking water India Family planning Poverty Pakistan Mozambique Maternity services Vaccination South Africa Sanitation Sierra Leone Myanmar Afghanistan Russia Serbia Sudan Kosovo Zimbabwe Palestine Nigeria Yemen Uganda Bosnia and Herzegovina Indonesia Ethiopia Niger Bangladesh Democratic Republic of the Congo Rwanda Somalia International Labour Organization UNESCO Malawi Nepal Ghana Liberia Kenya Vietnam Malaria Tanzania Polio Malnutrition Commonwealth Secretariat Zambia Food and Agriculture Organization International Organization for Migration World Health Organization UN Industrial Development Organization UNICEF UN Development Programme Angola Moldova Kyrgyzstan Cambodia The Gambia Burundi Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Tajikistan Lesotho Private Infrastructure Development Group UN-Habitat Bilateral Aid Review Multilateral Aid Review UN International Strategy for Disaster Reduction GAVI Alliance
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-11 18:14:52 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_719256
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_719256
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_719256